Tap a receipt part Original words
Public archive Original words Public posts Context check
The short answer
Choose the receipt before believing something changed
Tap words, date, change, or context. Search stays available when you already know exactly which phrase to check.
Already have an exact phrase, person, or issue? Question guide
The short answer
Read the receipt A strong claim needs the original words, when they were captured, what changed, and whether context is missing.How to read it
Before believing someone changed their story
The archive should show the original text and source status before turning a change into a conclusion.
1 Original words You are here
2 Captured date Next check
3 Change detected Next check
4 Context pending Next check
Original words
Selected receipt part
What exactly was said?
- What it checks
- Quote only public text with source and date.
- Limit before sharing
- Without original text, the page should not turn a summary into an accusation.
Ready to read 5 minutes
Choose your path
See what changed before sharing an accusation.
The archive should show original words, date, change, and missing context.
Already have an exact name or topic? Question guide
Ballot starting point
Selected path
Open the right race first.
Avoid comparing people before the office, date, and ballot context are clear.
Open Captures
Preparing dated entries before publishing
Public posts
Reviewing public civic accounts
Changes
Reviewing edits or removals with context
Needs context
179 before summary
Watch list
Promises and posts worth checking
Even before captures are published, you can see which changes need original words, date, and context before becoming an accusation.
Moved promise
When a promise disappears or moves pages, check the original version before sharing it.
Edited post
A wording change needs a capture date and public link, not just a screenshot.
Video or speech
Video quotes need transcript text, approximate time, and surrounding context.
Voter question
If a claim sounds new, first look for prior words about the same issue.
Public rule
Public scope
Monitoring stays scoped to public civic figures and public accounts; sensitive details are not shown.
Unique value Changed claims become checkable
Claims, issue pages, and profiles can point back to dated public originals.
Use rule Quote public source with context
Archive entries should include date, source type, and enough context to be fair.
Scope risk Monitor public civic accounts
The product should not drift into private-person tracking.
What is being checked
Promise and post watch
| Place | Items | Check | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| Campaign website | 71 | Daily | Ready |
| Public social account | 184 | Hourly | Ready |
| Questionnaire | 28 | Weekly | Ready |
| Video transcript | 29 | Manual | Review |
What you can conclude
How it supports a claim
Claim vs. record
47% Compares exact words with dated votes, filings, archived pages, and public statements before calling something a contradiction.
Changed words
51% Compares public statements and archived captures so wording changes stay tied to dates and original context.
Proof strength
57% Rates whether an answer has enough public receipts, dates, and source variety to be useful.
Missing pieces
55% Shows where missing, stale, blocked, or careful-use sources should lower confidence.
Watch list
Captured public statements
| Date | Person | Topic | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-08 | Keisha Lance Bottoms | Race status | Democratic nominee |
| 2026-06-08 | Rick Jackson | Race status | Republican runoff candidate |
| 2026-06-08 | Burt Jones | Race status | Republican runoff candidate |