Tap an issue Housing
Priority selector
Tap the problem most likely to change your vote.
Each issue opens a voter question, the evidence needed, and the path to follow next.Selected issue
Who will make it easier to live here?
- Evidence needed
- Public stance, dated plan, and attributed source.
Issue guide Topic index Change tracking Evidence labeled
What to check now
Pick the issue you want solved first
Choose a topic, see whether public stances exist, and open only comparisons with attributed sources and care status.
Already have an exact issue, candidate, or claim? Question guide
The short answer
Open housing Start with the problem you want the next official to solve. Then compare positions only when they have a source, date, and care status.
People in this race
Now ask this issue of each candidate.
Names come from public race sources. Positions appear only when there is public wording, a date, and a receipt. Active issue Housing
Candidate Words Date Receipt
KL Keisha Lance Bottoms Advanced to general election
- Issue stance
- Not confirmed yet
- Question to open
- What has Keisha Lance Bottoms said about housing?
- Issue stance
- Not confirmed yet
- Question to open
- What has Rick Jackson said about housing?
- Issue stance
- Not confirmed yet
- Question to open
- What has Burt Jones said about housing?
Ready to read 5 minutes
Choose your path
Turn an issue into a decision you can use.
Start with the outcome you want, then check promise, source, money, and changes.
Already have an exact name or topic? Question guide
Ballot starting point
Selected path
Open the right race first.
Avoid comparing people before the office, date, and ballot context are clear.
OpenVoter path
Turn an issue into a decision
Do not start with an ideology label. Start with the outcome you want, check the promise, confirm the source, then compare candidates.
1. Outcome What do you want changed? Define the problem before reading a stance. Open step 2. Promise What does each candidate propose? Require text, date, and source before comparing. Open step 3. Incentive Who benefits? Money adds context, not a conclusion by itself. Open step 4. Change Did the stance change? The archive helps reveal moved or removed promises. Open step
What to check now
Choose by the question you have
Look for concrete proposals, not just slogans.
The date matters when a promise appears late.
Connect money, interests, and likely outcomes.
A position should have a public source and evidence path.
Issue families
18 available for comparison
Confirmed positions
0 visible stances now
Confirmed changes
0 dated changes
Source gaps
7 need more sources
Top issues
Issue families
Start with the issue, then open a comparison only when there is enough evidence to support it.
Evidence sources
Where issue data comes from
| Source Class | Use | Strength | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| Voting record | Promise vs record | High | Ready |
| Public statement | Stance summary | Medium | Ready |
| Questionnaire | Direct position | Medium | Ready |
| Money groups | Influence context | Medium | Context only |
Explanations ready
How each issue will be explained
Claim vs. record
47% Compares exact words with dated votes, filings, archived pages, and public statements before calling something a contradiction.
Issue movement
53% Shows when a position appears to change and which dated public source supports that reading.
Public record check
42% Shows which public record areas were checked and which details stay summarized instead of exposed.
Proof strength
57% Rates whether an answer has enough public receipts, dates, and source variety to be useful.
Public rule
No unsupported claims
A stance is only shown as a comparison when it has a public source, date, care status, and evidence path.